DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: The author is not a registered stockbroker nor a registered advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity, index or any other financial instrument at any time. While he believes his statements to be true, they always depend on the reliability of his own credible sources. The author recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and that you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Berkshire Hathaway Bounces Back From 7% Plunge To Avoid Closing Below $100,000



Berkshire Hathaway shares traded below $100,000 for the first time in over two years today, but they did not close in five-digit territory.

At their lowest today (Thursday) just about three hours before the closing bell, Berkshire shares hit $96,050, a drop of 7.05% on the day.

The stock then rallied along with the rest of the market, closing at $102,800. Berkshire hasn't closed below $100,000 since October 20, 2006.

While Berkshire avoided that distinction today, its loss of $533 (0.52%) does bring it to a fresh two-year closing low.

The stock is down 31.1 percent from its all-time closing high of $149,200 last December.
Berkshire's downdraft, and a weak earnings report for the third quarter, are prompting some talk that Warren Buffett has lost his touch. CNBC's David Faber reported yesterday that some investors are shorting Berkshire in the wake of Friday's quarterly results.

Investor Doug Kass had been short Berkshire for most of the year, before covering that position at a profit in August. Now he has a new summary of what he sees as Buffett's mistakes over the past few years in a post on TheStreet.com headlined Warren Buffett Has Lost His Groove. And what about the argument that Buffett invests for the long term, making short-term setbacks unimportant? Kass writes, "Buffett's notion of long term is now becoming a convenient shroud to poorly timed investments."

"Is the notion of long term now irrelevant, particularly given Warren Buffett's age and the likelihood that sooner than later he will be succeeded by one or several new individuals at Berkshire's helm? Is it irrelevant ... in a possible multiyear bear market or in an economy that faces headwinds we haven't seen in decades? Or is it just one of those tautologies that it is safe to buy in the long term?"

Yes, Buffett has been counted out before. But this time, Kass contends, it's different.

Source

No comments: