DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: The author is not a registered stockbroker nor a registered advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity, index or any other financial instrument at any time. While he believes his statements to be true, they always depend on the reliability of his own credible sources. The author recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and that you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments.

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Comcast would pay $16 million in proposed Internet settlement

One million Comcast Corp. high-speed Internet customers could be eligible for rebates under a $16 million proposed class-action settlement stemming from the cable company's disruption of peer-to-peer Web traffic. The rebates could be $16 per customer.

The settlement, disclosed in federal court in Philadelphia, still needs final approval by U.S. District Judge Legrome D. Davis. A hearing on the settlement is scheduled for June. Six individual suits were consolidated into one case in Philadelphia, court documents show. Plaintiffs' attorneys could claim up to $3 million from the $16 million in fees.

Comcast did not admit wrongdoing, and the company believes its Internet practices were correct - although Comcast dropped them under political pressure in 2008.

The number of 1 million Comcast customers is an estimate contained in court documents. Comcast Internet customers will have to say they used peer-to-peer software programs between 2006 and 2008 to collect the rebates or refunds. The most popular of these software programs was BitTorrent; others were Ares, eDonkey, FastTrack, and Gnutella.

Mark Todzo, a lawyer with the Lexington Law Group in San Francisco who represented plaintiff Jon Hart, said yesterday that he was pleased with the settlement. Hart, a California resident and Comcast Internet customer, contacted Todzo's law firm after he could not share video of Grateful Dead concerts, Todzo said.

Comcast said it disrupted the traffic of some heavy Internet users - so-called Internet hogs - to maintain speeds for millions of others. The Philadelphia cable giant, the nation's largest provider of residential Internet, called the practice "reasonable network management." But critics claimed that Comcast viewed peer-to-peer online video as competition for cable TV and was making the peer-to-peer software difficult to use.

In August 2008, the Federal Communications Commission, then with Kevin Martin as its chairman, ordered Comcast to give the agency more details of its Internet practices, submit a plan on how it intended to stop interfering with Internet traffic, and disclose the new Internet management practices to customers. No fine was levied.

Comcast has appealed the FCC enforcement action to a federal court. A hearing on the case is scheduled for Jan. 8. Comcast said the proposed $16 million settlement would end the class-action part of the controversy.

Claim Your Free Book "Make Real Money On the Internet"

No comments: