DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER: The author is not a registered stockbroker nor a registered advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity, index or any other financial instrument at any time. While he believes his statements to be true, they always depend on the reliability of his own credible sources. The author recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and that you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments.
Showing posts with label healthcare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label healthcare. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Americans are getting poorer, and it's going to get worse

The early impact of the worst recession since the 1930s pushed median incomes down, forced millions more people into poverty and left more Americans without health care in 2008, according to new annual survey data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Poor people, working people, blacks, Hispanics and children bore a disproportionate share of the hardship. The new figures, however, likely understate the severity of the economic downturn because a large portion of nation's job losses and unemployment rate increases occurred after the Census survey data was collected in March as part of the annual Current Population Survey.

The poor performances of key economic and social indicators come as little surprise, since the recession officially began in December 2007 and continued to create economic carnage for 18 months before appearing to bottom out over the summer.

_ Along the way, the nation's real median income — the point at which half the nation earns less and half more — fell 3.6 percent from $52,163 in 2007 to $50,303 in 2008. That was the first such decline in three years and the worst in the first year of any recession since Census Bureau began collecting the data during World War II, said Lawrence F. Katz, an economics professor at Harvard University.

_ Men and women were both affected. Full-time working men saw their median incomes fall by 1 percent from $46,846 to $46,367, while female earnings declined by 1.9 percent, from $36,451 to $35,745.

_ The worst is yet to come. "This is just the beginning, or the tip of the iceberg because 2008 was not nearly as bad an economy as 2009," Katz said. The average unemployment rate in 2008 was 5.8 percent, up from 4.6 percent in 2007. That pales in comparison with the 9 percent average unemployment rate so far this year, and it's likely to increase. August unemployment was 9.7 percent, and it's expected to peak above 10 percent in the months to come.

_ Because real median household income is 4.2 percent lower than it was in 2000, Katz said, "We've basically seen a lost decade for the American family," with only the top earning families doing better now than they were in 2000.

The national poverty rate also hit its highest level since 1997, jumping to 13.2 percent in 2008 from 12.5 percent in 2007. The increase meant that 39.8 million people lived below the poverty line, the most since 1960. That's up from 37.3 million in 2007. For children, the poverty rate hit 19 percent, or 14.1 million youngsters in 2008. That means 35.3 percent of the nation's poor in 2008 were under age 18.

Heidi Shierholz, an economist with the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute, estimated that 25 percent of U.S. children would be in poverty next year and 26.6 percent in 2010. "This would represent an increase of 10.4 percentage points from 2000 to 2010 — truly a lost decade," Shierholz said.

Meanwhile, the number of people without health insurance increased from 45.7 million in 2007 to 46.3 million in 2008, even though the percentage of uninsured Americans didn't change, at 15.4 percent. About 46 percent of the nation's uninsured are non-Hispanic whites, but as a group, 11 percent of non-Hispanic whites lack coverage, compared with 19 percent of blacks and 31 percent of Hispanics. About 45 percent of noncitizens lack coverage.

Following President Barack Obama's Wednesday night speech to Congress in which he stressed the need for comprehensive health care legislation, many supporters used the new Census estimates to support Obama's call for change.

At the Yorkville Common Pantry, an emergency meal program in East Harlem, Joel Berg, the executive director of the New York City Coalition Against Hunger, said the troubling numbers underscore the need for health reform.

"Today's new numbers make it clearer than ever that lack of health insurance and inability to pay medical bills is one of the greatest contributing factors to poverty and hunger in America," Berg said. "People in poor health rarely earn significant wealth."

Henry E. Simmons, President of the National Coalition on Health Care, another group pushing for reform, said the Census data also shows that more than 600,000 adults who earn more than $75,000 a year also lost coverage in 2008.

"The problem of (the uninsured) is not confined to the less affluent. More middle-income Americans are losing their health insurance coverage," Simmons said.

As in previous economic downturns, public health coverage through government-run programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, and the State Children's Health Insurance Program helped cover many people otherwise would've gone without. Enrollment in Medicaid and SCHIP alone increased by 3 million in 2008.

This expanded coverage caused the number of uninsured children to fall from 8.1 million or 11 percent in 2007 to 7.3 million of 9.9 percent in 2008.

"This was the lowest number (and percentage) of children without health insurance since 1987," said David Johnson, who heads the Census Bureau's housing and household economics statistics division.

Many experts think the 2008 data substantially understates how many people lack health coverage today because the unemployment rate in 2008 ranged from 4.8 to 7.2 percent compared with 9.7 percent in August.

Ron Pollack, the executive director of the health care advocacy group, Families USA, said every percentage point increase in the unemployment rate adds about 1.1 million people to the uninsured rolls. He estimates that 50 million Americans now lack coverage.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Moody’s takes a dip, after the company’s 2010 profit forecast misses analyst expectations

On Wall Street, Thursday, shares of Moody’s Corp., a New York-based credit ratings agency, fell 6.1 percent, even though the company outperformed analysts’ earnings estimates for the fourth quarter and full year of 2009. Moody’s issued guidance for 2010 of single-digit percentage increases in both revenue and earnings.

Moody’s reported net income of $101.9 million for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2009, down from $88.7 million in the same quarter the previous year. Diluted earnings per share for the fourth quarter were 43 cents, up from 37 cents in the fourth quarter of 2008.

The ratings agency reported revenue of $485.8 million for the fourth quarter, up from $403.7 million in the same quarter the previous year.

“We anticipate continuing recovery for 2010, but also expect market conditions to remain challenging until economic improvement across key markets is sustained,” said Chairman and CEO Raymond McDaniel in the company’s earnings release. “We are projecting a stronger revenue increase and a return to earnings growth for 2010, with ongoing expense management to support business initiatives and regulatory and compliance efforts.”

Edward J. Atorino, analyst with The Benchmark Co. LLC, said in a research note Friday, “While 2008 and 2009 were tough markets for bond issuance, we believe the worst of Moody’s fundamental decline has passed.”

Moody’s provided guidance for full-year 2010 earnings ranging from $1.75-$1.85 per diluted share. Zack’s consensus earnings estimate for 2010 is $1.86 per diluted share.

The rating agency had net income of $402 million for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2009, down 12.2 percent from $457.6 million in 2008. Earnings for the full year 2009 were $1.69 per diluted share, down from $1.87 per diluted share in the previous year. Zacks’ estimate was $1.66 per diluted share.

Despite rising demand for debt grades amid thawing credit market, Moody’s forecast its expenses and revenue will both increase “in the high-single-digit percent range” this year.

The global ratings agency is facing increased regulations as its less-than-perfect ratings have help fuel the recent financial crisis. When asked when the senate is expected to move on the overall financial package, the Chairman and CEO Raymond McDaniel answered, “I would expect if anything is going to happen, it’s going to happen in the second quarter. After that, with the election year, I think it will be decreasingly likely that an action will take place in 2010.”

But amid a slew of items on the discussion table including healthcare, experts doubt that financial regulation is high on the senate’s agenda.

On Thursday, Moody’s stocks skidded $1.71 or more than 6 percent to $26.39.

Free Book "Make Real Money on the Internet" from world’s #1 internet wealth advocate Stephen Pierce. absolutely free!

Get your copy now!